✅ Comparison Table for Domestic Solar & Heat Technologies
Technology | Typical Power/Output | Efficiency | Best Suited For | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monocrystalline Solar PV | 2 – 10 kW electrical | 18–22% | Homes with limited roof space | High efficiency, long lifespan | Higher upfront cost |
Polycrystalline Solar PV | 2 – 10 kW electrical | 15–18% | Homes with larger roofs, budget-sensitive installs | Lower cost, proven tech | Lower efficiency, needs more space |
Thin-Film Solar PV | 1 – 5 kW electrical | 10–12% | Unusual roofs, facades, lightweight needs | Flexible, low cost | Lower efficiency, shorter lifespan |
Air Source Heat Pump | 3 – 15 kW thermal | COP 2.5–3.5 | Most homes, moderate climates | Easy to install, heating & cooling | Less efficient in very cold weather |
Ground Source Heat Pump | 5 – 30 kW thermal | COP 3.5–5 | Homes with land access, colder climates | High efficiency, year-round reliability | Expensive, requires land/drilling |
Evacuated Vacuum Tubes | 1 – 5 kW thermal | 60–80% (heat capture) | Domestic hot water, solar heating support | High efficiency, works in cold/cloudy weather | Only produces heat (not electricity) |